Answer:
step 1 communative property
Step-by-step explanation:
just look it up I forget about this
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The phrase "Three times the quantity five less than x" means 3 multiplied by the difference of x minus 5
3(x-5)
The phrase "the product of six and x" means the number 6 multiplied by x
6x
therefore
The phrase" Three times the quantity five less than x, divided by the product of six and x" is equal to the quotient of 3(x-5) and 6x
Answer:
The answer is 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
First, it is important to recall that the group law is not commutative in general, so we cannot assume it here. In order to solve the exercise we need to remember the axioms of group, specially the existence of the inverse element, i.e., for each element 
there exist another element, denoted by 
such that 
, where 
stands for the identity element of G.
So, given the equality 
we make a left multiplication by 
and we obtain:
But, 
. Hence, 
.
Now, in the equality we make a right multiplication by 
, and we obtain
.
Recall that 
and 
. Therefore,
.
Answer:
The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes of the bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that two sizea of avocados are being sold, since the regular size is being sold for $0.84 each, let the price for the bigger avocado be $x.
Then note the following:
1. How bigger than the smaller avocado is the bigger one?
This would determine if the price for the bigger one is a bargain, or a mistake.
If for instance, the bigger avocado is double the size of the smaller one, then for any price, $x less that $1.68 (twice of $0.84), it is a bargain.
The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.
We want to write an inequality that tells how much Hannah should walk this week. The inequality will be:
x ≥ (3 + 3/4) mi
<h3>
Finding the inequality:</h3>
We know that she already did walk 2 3/4 miles this week, and she wants to walk at least 6 1/2 miles.
So to reach that minimum, she needs to walk:
(6 1/2)mi - (2 + 3/4) mi = (3 + 3/4) mi
And she can walk that or more, so the inequality is:
x ≥ (3 + 3/4) mi
Where x represents how much she will walk this week.
If you want to learn more about inequalities, you can read:
brainly.com/question/11234618
