Hi!
If she worked 18 hours last week and 20 hours this week, then she worked 38 hours in total, because 18 + 20 = 38.
If she earns $6 per hour, and she worked for 38 hours, then she got 38 sets of 6, which you can find the answer to by multiplying 38 and 6.
This is essentially 6 + 6 + 6 +...
38 * 6 = $228
So she earned $228 these two weeks.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
13/28.
Step-by-step explanation:
(8/14 - 2/8) + 1/7
We can just remove the parentheses and simplify its contents:
= 4/7 - 1/4 + 1/7
= 4/7 + 1/7 - 1/4
= 5/7 - 1/4 The LCD of 7 and 4 is 28 so we have:
20/28 - 7/28
= 13/28.
M is the exponent of z inside parentheses. In expanded form, the exponent of z is 8m, so m is 1/8 of the exponent of z.
The correct question is
<span>Teresa graphs the following 3 equations: y=2x, y=x2+2, and y=2x2. She says that the graph of y=2x will eventually surpass both of the other graphs. Is Teresa correct? Why or why not?
we have that
y=2x
y=x</span>²+2
y=2x²
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
<span>We can affirm the following
</span>the three graphs present the same domain-----> the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graph y=2x is the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graphs y=x²+2 and y=2x² is the interval [0,∞)
therefore
<span>Teresa is not correct because the graph of y = 2x will not surpass the other two graphs since in the interval of [0, infinite) the three graphs present the same range</span>
Answer:
m = 35
Step-by-step explanation:
2m + m -15 = 90
3m -15 = 90
+15 +15
3m = 105
/3 /3
m = 35
To check the work just insert 35 for m:
2(35) + 35 -15 = 90
70 + 35 -15 = 90
105 - 15 = 90
90 = 90