"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
<span>Economies of Scale. This means as firms produce more their average costs fall. ...Brand Loyaly. Some firms have high degrees of brand loyalty. ...Geographical Barriers. Some Industries are specific to a certain area. ...<span>Patents.
</span></span>
Answer:
This sounds a lot like heat stroke.
Explanation:
I know someone who had one of these, and this sounds a lot like what he went through.
1. Encourage entrepreneurship. People can start their own businesses and eventually employ other people.
2. The government should invest in developing industries. This would create more jobs.
3. Education should be made cheaper. The quality of education should also be increased, so that once young people graduate, they have higher chances of getting employed.
4. The government should partner with private companies to create more job opportunities for people.
