1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
docker41 [41]
3 years ago
13

When does skydiver reach terminal velocity?

Physics
1 answer:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
5 0
When the force of air resistance on the skydiver
is equal to the skydiver's weight.
You might be interested in
You roll a bowling ball down the lane and it takes 23 seconds to reach the pins. What is the total time it takes the ball to mov
Goryan [66]

Answer:

B. 23s

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A circle graph shows that one-fourth of the students in a particular school ride the bus every day. What is this equivalent meas
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

it's 1.57... radians and 90°

3 0
2 years ago
A train moving west with an initial velocity of 20 m/s accelerates at 4 m/s' for 10 secon
MArishka [77]

Answer:

Distance of 400m.

Explanation:

Use your kinematics equation to solve for distance (we can use kinematics b/c acceleration is constant).

d = (initial velocity x time) + 1/2 at^2

d = (20 x 10) + 1/2 (4) (10)^2

d = 200 + 200

d = 400 m

5 0
2 years ago
30.42
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer: Try C

Explanation:

It's the only one that makes since.

7 0
2 years ago
Theorem: there is no smallest positive rational number.theorem: there is no smallest positive rational number. a proof by contra
matrenka [14]

Assume there is a smallest rational integer that has the following form: a/b

Then observe that we can define a/(b+1), which is strictly less than a/b because its divisor is bigger and is rational because it is the product of two numbers. Due to the contradiction created by our original claims that a/b is the smallest rational number that is possible, we might conclude that there is no such thing as the smallest rational number.

There can therefore be no smallest rational number because we may always define a smaller rational number than the one we now possess.

<h3>What is Rational number ?</h3>

Any number that can be expressed as a ratio is considered reasonable. It is therefore possible to represent it as a fraction when the numerator and denominator are both full numbers.

Learn more about Rational number here:

brainly.com/question/12088221

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A cyclist rides in a circle with speed 8.1 m/s. What is his centripetal acceleration if the circle has a radius of 27 m? A. 3.3
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the most extreme system of social inequality?
    9·1 answer
  • As you found in Part A, your weight will be greater than normal when the elevator is moving upward with increasing speed. For wh
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the element shown here? A) This element tends to gain electrons to become stable. B) This element
    14·2 answers
  • if we could build rockets that could travel at the speed of light, how many years would it take for an astronaut to travel from
    13·1 answer
  • To throw the discus, the thrower holds it with a fully outstretched arm. Starting from rest, he begins to turn with a constant a
    12·1 answer
  • The use of a beat or a rhythm to remember something is
    8·2 answers
  • Which change will always result in an increase in the gravitational force between two objects?
    6·1 answer
  • Addition of a metal slab of thickness "a" between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor of plate separation "d" is equivalent
    12·1 answer
  • A ball is kicked at an angle of 35° with the ground.a) What should be the initial velocity of the ball so that it hits a target
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!