the answer that fits best is, or.
Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
The press is referred to as the fourth estate.
There are reasons why people often behave in certain ways. Dana was experiencing emotional hijacking.
<h3>What is An emotional hijacking? </h3>
- An emotional hijacking often takes place when something in one's environment influences a stress outburst in man. It might be a friend or close partner shouting, a work colleague lambasting you etc.
When a person experience stress, the brain releases two kinds of stress hormones called cortisol and adrenaline that makes the body to fight or to flee.
Conclusively, Hijacking is the correct option.
Learn more about emotional hijacking from
brainly.com/question/7905042