Answer:
Cost of common from reinvested earnings = 10.44 %
so correct option is c. 10.44%
Explanation:
given data
D1 = $0.67
Po = $27.50
g = 8.00%
to find out
cost of common from reinvested earnings based on the DCF approach
solution
we get here Cost of common from reinvested earnings that is express a s
Cost of common from reinvested earnings =
+ g ............1
put here value we get
Cost of common from reinvested earnings =
+ 8%
Cost of common from reinvested earnings = 10.44 %
so correct option is c. 10.44%
Answer:
N=5
, PV=-120
, PMT=4
, FV=145
Explanation:
In this question, we use the Rate formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $120
Assuming figure - Future value or Face value = $145
PMT = 4
NPER = 5
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
This is the answer and the same is not given in the options
Answer: Okay so, to make a profit The Rule of 72
Here's how it works: Take the percentage gain you have in a stock. Divide 72 by that number. The answer tells you how many times you have to compound that gain to double your money. If you get three 24% gains — and re-invest your profits each time — you will nearly double your money.
Explanation: There is a few answers to you're questions, I hope this helped!
Brainliest??
Answer:
Reinforce and reiterate the organization's commitment to scrum
Explanation:
The best way to deal with Hilton as in the above case is to reinforce and reiterate the organization's commitment to scrum because he is acting as a saboteur to scrum transition in the team. There is what we call synergy in a team, which signifies that a whole is better than a part hence his opinion must be ignored. The overall decision of a team in an organization supercedes that of an individual which is related to the firm's commitment on scrum.
Moreover, sending Hilton to scrum training will not be beneficial to the team because of his dislike towards the scrum transition hence the organization must make firm commitment towards scrum and ensure that Hilton's resistance is futile.
Answer:
Kyoko
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that in this scenario the individual with the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task is Kyoko. This is because opportunity cost refers to what is being lost when choosing one opportunity or decision as opposed to another, and in this scenario since Kyoko is way faster at changing the brakes than Jacques then he will be losing less money by changing the brakes than Kyoko.
Kyoko: 160/2 = $80 opportunity cost for changing the brakes.
Jacques: 20*5 = $100 opportunity cost for changing the brakes.