His confidence is a reflection of his "Self-efficacy".
Self-efficacy is characterized as an individual judgment of "how well one can execute strategies required to manage planned situations". Expectations of Self-efficacy decide if an individual will have the capacity to show adapting conduct and to what extent exertion will be supported despite obstacles. Individuals who have high Self-efficacy will apply adequate exertion that, if first rate, prompts effective results, though those with low Self-efficacy are probably going to stop exertion early and fail.
The reformers reconciled their desire to create moral order
with their quest to enhance personal freedom. This they did by stressing liberation
from external restraints, like slavery, and internal servitude, such as
drinking alcohol. <span>According to them, a lot of people were "slaves" to
various sins and liberating them from this enslavement would enable them to
compete economically.</span>
The North supported it. The South opposed it heavily, as they had to pay for it.
They already had Britain as an example as what to do and had Britain's inventions so they didn't need to invent anything, just use the inventions Britain thought of
This is false!
Attitude does not have anything to do with effectiveness: it can relate to everything. One can have an attitude towards everything: other people, ideas, places, it basically means an opinion about something, a way of thinking about something.
