Tort reform is a big part of health care reform because "It works to cut legal costs and keep medical issues out of the courts".
In general, after finding factually noteworthy confirmation we see that therapeutic tort reform is related with a lessening in health care services costs. In testing the impact of one, two, and three changes, we locate a critical negative connection between tort change and social insurance costs in states where two restorative tort changes were passed. In particular, we find that the section of two therapeutic tort changes altogether diminished both aggregate premiums and manager commitments to premiums. The outcomes were to a great extent irrelevant for states that passed one and three changes.
The whole amount of currency need to be the same.
The answers are:
<span>- post-conflict situation (the emotional trauma that might damage them after the abuse)
-. Low socioeconomic status of the woman and her abuser (society tend to see women that became the victim of sexual abuse as non desirable)
-. Proximity to drugs or alcohol by the woman and her abuser (usually the drugs and alcohol is used as a coping mechanism for the victim)</span>
Answer: it's C, Powers held by the states alone.
Explanation:
