Why did the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court refuse to resume the position after his first tenure

1 answer:

3 0

The reason why the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to resume the position after his first tenure was:

He felt that the Court did not have the ability to contribute to national affairs

According to the given question, we are asked to show the reason why the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to resume the position after his first tenure.

As a result of this, we can see that the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Jay did not want to continue his position after his first tenure because he did not believe that the Court had the ability to contribute to national affairs.

You might be interested in

BOTH INTERNATIONAL & INLAND What equipment for fog signals is required for a vessel 13 meters in length?

Lesechka [4]

Answer:

correct option is D) Whistle only

Explanation:

solution

equipment for fog signals is Whistle only because according to rule 33 of Equipment for Sound Signals

as length 12 meter or more than 12 meter there need only a whistle

and when length is more than 20 meter than bell in addition required with whistle

and length 100 meter or more than gong is additional provided with bell and whistle

so here

correct option is D) Whistle only

6 0

3 years ago

Experiments in which all variables are identical except for one are called _____ experiments.

Liula [17]

Experiments in which all variables are identical except for one are called controlled experiments. This where an observer tests his hypothesis by looking on changes that were brought about by one variable. The results are always dependent on one adjusted variable.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

One reason why the spanish easily conquered the americas was the aztecs and incas lacked

Angelina_Jolie [31]

Wealth and power, Loyalty to their leaders , The will to fight to the death, Resistance to European diseases

3 0

3 years ago

Fresh Produce, Inc., and Great Grocery Stores dispute the interpretation of an ambiguous phrase in their contract. In a suit bet

givi [52]

Answer:

The answer is: Ambiguous clauses.

Explanation

Ambiguous clauses we refer to those clauses contained in contracts that are not clear and offer various interpretations of an ambiguous nature, which implies that an interpretation of it is made.

The answer is: Ambiguous clauses.

7 0

3 years ago

Claire had a stroke and has suffered brain damage. unfortunately when she tries to communicate, her words do not make sense. she

boyakko [2]

The fact that Claire who had a stroke followed by brain damage, has problems communicating because her words do not make sense and she is confused suggests that Claire has damage to her Wernicke's area. The Wernicke's area is a region of the brain important in language and responsible for the comprehension of speech. When damaged, problems like those of Claire can occur.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers