Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
Answer:
Coffee Company a U.S. Firm went to a U.S. Court to order the property that was taken in the Dominican Republic government. <u>This is an application of Sovereign Immunity doctrine</u>. So the correct option will be option "c"
Explanation:
Because the Dominican Republic is not part of U.S territory, the judge cannot decide in that case, it is not in the court's jurisdiction. Sovereign immunity is a legal doctrine that says that a legal state or sovereign cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution.
Next time check your question more careful, as you haven't share any options. Anyway, I've got some useful points that will definitely help you to complete this task, so the situationh can form grounds for disputing an arbitrator's decision in a court of law is both passing a quick judgment and n<span>ot keeping an official written record of the hearing.
I do hope you will find that helpful!</span>
Answer:
1. Can lead to instability in local markets
2. Damages buildings, making businesses have to close down
hope this helps! <3
Answer my question on my profile and I’ll answer your question.