Africa because they had ample sources of foreign currencies.
Answer:
Mobashar's situation best exemplifies a hybrid identity.
Explanation:
Hybrid identities are the result of the mixing of cultures. A person growing up in a specific country, still being taught that country's social norms and values, may still be largely influenced by other groups' and nations' cultures as well, becoming a culturally hybrid individual. The mixing of cultures happens faster and more easily now due to advancements in technology and communications. There is no need to physically live in another country to be able to learn and absorb its culture. That is the case with Mobashar. He is culturally hybrid, having embraced different aspects and values as his own.
The primary distinction between the two is that Confucius places a greater emphasis on the value of developing one's knowledge in addition to loving and respecting one's fellow humans.
While Lao Tau places a strong emphasis on the value of cultivating inner peace and achieving a sense of equilibrium in one's life,
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Confucius?</h3>
Generally, Confucius was a Chinese philosopher and statesman who lived during the Spring and Autumn era. He is widely regarded as the most illustrious of all Chinese wise men and women. The teachings and philosophy of Confucius continue to have a significant impact on culture and society in East Asia, especially in China and other parts of East Asia.
In conclusion, Confucius stresses the value of loving and respecting people together with increasing knowledge, which is the major distinction between the two.
Lao Tau, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of achieving balance in your life and inner tranquility.
Read more about Confucius
brainly.com/question/10163227
#SPJ1
IT IS Portugal they were the first
The correct answer is b) a growing spirit of democracy and equality between classes”
In “Democracy in America” by Alexis de Tocqueville in 1831, he said in the first phrases:
<em>“Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions. (…) The more I advanced in the study of American society, the more I perceived that the equality of conditions is the fundamental fact from which all others seem to be derived, and the central point at which all my observations constantly terminated.”</em>
