Answer: <em>Option (C) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A recurrent conclusion of injuries occurred while falling is a long-term pain, medication for these are not taken in consideration among intermediate per-person costs of emergency cure for aged or old individuals's laceration from such falls</em>, if true, will have the tendency to seriously undermines conclusion of argument given in the comprehension.
This states that argument given in the comprehension has not taken in consideration cost for medicine which overall will increase cost. Thereby with an increase in cost the given statement will become untrue since the cost of surgery and medicine combined is higher than cost, in such a case treatment would be more economical. Therefore it undermines conclusion of argument.
Answer:
The property would be given to the next available direct relation of his who happens to be his sister. This is because, most property are shared among siblings. Since Smith's sister is one of his sibling, she is entitled to receive the property.
Explanation:
Answer:
Total cost of Job A3B= $31,900
Explanation:
Job A3B was ordered by a customer on September 25.
The company applies overhead at a rate of 100% of the direct labor cost incurred.
Cost of September:
$3,400 of direct materials
$4,900 of direct labor.
$4,900 manufactured overhead
Total= $13,200
Cost of October:
$3,900 of direct materials
$7,400 of direct labor
$7,400 manufactured overhead
Total= $18,700
Total cost of Job A3B= 13,200 + 18,700= $31,900
