All categories

3 years ago

A labor shortage that is seen to be temporary, yet approaching quickly, would be handled best by

1 answer:

3 0

<span>An upcoming labor shortage that is expected to be temporary can be met and alleviated by using temporary labor solutions shush as offering overtime or other incentives for increased productivity from established workers, hiring from temporary labor pools, or cross training existing workers to be productive in other areas of labor as needed.</span>

You might be interested in

Crimp corporation uses direct labor-hours in its predetermined overhead rate. at the beginning of the year, the estimated direct

Anton [14]

First of all, the predetermined overhead will be calculated.

Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated manufacturing overhead / Estimated direct labor hour

Predetermined overhead rate = $ 258,000 ÷ 15,000 hours = $ 17.20 per direct labor hour

Actual manufacturing overheads = $ 253,000

Applied manufacturing overheads = Predetermined overhead rate × Actual direct labor hours

Applied manufacturing overheads = $ 17.20 × 13,100 = 225,320

Applied manufacturing overheads are less than actual manufacturing overheads, thus overheads are under applied.

Actual manufacturing overheads - Applied manufacturing overheads = $ 27,680 under applied

4 0

3 years ago

Caspian Sea Drinks needs to raise $41.00 million by issuing bonds. It plans to issue a 14.00 year semi-annual pay bond that has

Darya [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

Coupon rate = 5.07%

Yield to maturity = 4.84%

Rate = Yield/2 = 2.42%

N = 14 = 14*2 semiannually = 28 semiannually

Face value = $1000

PMT = (face value*coupon rate)/2 = $25.35

Need to find price which is PV

Using the financial calculator, PV = $1023

Number of bonds to be issued = 41,000,000/1023 = 40,078

5 0

3 years ago

Coffee and tea are substitutes for consumers. An increase in the price of coffee coupled with an increase in the number of tea g

hammer [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

As the coffee prices are relative higher than what it actually ends up paying, person will pay above their face value to obtain. Same will apply the same idea for that concept.

As tea is also icnreases we will pushed there.

In the long term we should review how this is done as usually end up here and allone

Therefore the compete sentences will be:

An increase in the price of coffee coupled with an increase in the number of tea growers the lower adverzare will occur within a year Also, we could check for it at 12.600

6 0

3 years ago

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that hi

tangare [24]

Answer:

The correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete because some important figures and points are missing in it. These figures and points are therefore provided to complete the question before answering it as follows:

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that his marginal benefit from an additional soft drink is $100 and his marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza is $110. If the price of a soft drink is $2 and the price of a slice of pizza is $3, is Charley maximizing his total benefits?

A. No, he should increase his consumption of both goods.

B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

C. Yes, there is no other consumption choice that will make his total benefits greater.

D. No, he should shift consumption toward pizza and away from soft drinks to maximize total benefits.'

The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:

Under utility maximization theory, the condition for the utility or benefit maximization for two goods is as follows:

MBs / Ps = MBp / Pp ……………………………. (1)

Where:

MBs = Marginal benefit from an additional soft drink = $100

MBp = Marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza =$110

Ps = Price of a soft drink = $2

Pp = Price of a slice of pizza = $3

Subtitling the relevant values, we have:

MBs / Ps = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft drinks = $100 / $2 = 50

MBp / Pp = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft pizza = $110 / $3 = 36.67

This implies that 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67

The decision rule is that the limited money income should be spent by a consumer on the good which gives the higher marginal utility per dollar in order to maximize marginal benefit.

Since 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67 above, this implies that Charley is NOT maximizing his total benefits. To maximize his total benefits, Charley should consume more of soft drinks and less of pizza until the condition is consistent with equation (1).

Therefore, the correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

7 0

2 years ago

Explain in detail how Boulders Mall's management may have used media relations as a public relations tool to try to resolve cont

Arada [10]

Explanation:

The management of Boulders Mall made use of the media to offer an apology for what happened in the shopping center, making it clear that there was not actually an act of discrimination due to the way the man dressed in traditional Ndebele clothes dressed and clarifying that in no case At the time, man was discriminated against because of his culture or his traditions.

This was a public way of "calming" the controversies and upsets that could have been generated in many people, because we must remember that this type of action can generate rejection by the community towards the shopping center and generate great economic losses.

4 0

2 years ago