All categories

3 years ago

16 divided by 6.08 . 2 digit divisors

Mathematics

2 answers:

astra-53 [7]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is 22.08 you just have to dived

ratelena [41]3 years ago

5 0

Lastly, 16 goes into 128 exactly 8 times, and the division is over. 2. Divide. First write a multiplication table for the divisor. Check each answer by multiplying.

You might be interested in

90 points please help!!!!!!!!

just olya [345]

To model this situation, we are going to use the exponential function: $f(t)=P(1+ \frac{r}{n} )^{nt}$
where
$P$ is the initial number of cars
$r$ is the growing rate in decimal form
$n$ is number of tames the growing rate is increasing per year
$t$ is the time in years

To convert the growing rate to decimal form, we are going to divide the rate by 100%
$r= \frac{12}{100}$
$r=0.12$
Since the growing rate is increasing quarterly, $n=4$ . We also know that the initial number of cars is 920, so $P=920$ . Lets replace all those values in our function:
$f(t)=920(1+ \frac{0.12}{4} )^{4t}$
$f(t)=920(1+0.03)^{4t}$
$f(t)=900(1.03)^{4t}$

We can conclude that:
Rate ---------> The quarterly rate of growth is 0.03 or 3%
Exponent --------> The compound periods multiplied by the number of years is 4t
Coefficient--------> The initial number of cars serviced is 920
Base------> The growth factor is represented by 1.03

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Alison can pay for her gym membership on a monthly basis but if she pays for an entire year of the membership and event shall re

horsena [70]

What do you think the answer is? Tell me and I will help you some more! :)

6 0

3 years ago

Assuming the incident of fires for individual reactors can be described by a Poisson distribution, what is the probability that

Maksim231197 [3]

Complete Question

The Brown's Ferry incident of 1975 focused national attention on the ever-present danger of fires breaking out in nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has estimated that with present technology there will be on average, one fire for every 10 years for a reactor. Suppose that a certain state has two reactors on line in 2020 and they behave independently of one another. Assuming the incident of fires for individual reactors can be described by a Poisson distribution, what is the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors?

Answer:

The value is $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 0.5940$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The rate at which fire breaks out every 10 years is $\lambda = 1$

Generally the probability distribution function for Poisson distribution is mathematically represented as

$P(x) = \frac{\lambda^x}{ k! } * e^{-\lambda}$

Here x represent the number of state which is 2 i.e $x_1 \ \ and \ \ x_2$

Generally the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors is mathematically represented as

$P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - P(x_1 + x_2 \le 1 )$

=> $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [P(x_1 + x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 + x_2 = 1 )]$

=> $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [ P(x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 1 ) + P(x_1 , x_2 = 0)]$

=> $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - P(x_1 = 0)P(x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 = 0 ) P( x_2 = 1 )+ P(x_1 = 1 )P(x_2 = 0)$

=> $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - \{ [ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]] )+ ( [ \frac{1^1}{1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}]] ) + ( [ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]]) \}$

=> $P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 1- [[0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] ]$

$P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 0.5940$

3 0

3 years ago

What is 79.35 divided by 5

liraira [26]

79.35 divided by 5 equals: 15.87
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To check:
243
15.87
 x 5.00
 0000
 0000
79.35
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hope this helped! :)
Any more questions, please ask! :)

5 0

4 years ago

Find the slope and y-intercept of the graph of 4x-3=36

Oxana [17]

Answer: Slope is undefined or aka infinity, and there is no y-intercept

Step-by-step explanation:

Using Slope-Intercept Form to find the slope and the y-intercept.

First, lets change 4x-3=36 into y=mx+b. When you change it into this form you'll see that it can't go into intercept form because x=39/4 and is a vertical line so the slope is undefined or aka infinity, and there is no y-intercept.

Hope this helps! Have a nice day! ❤

- Cutiepatutie

6 0

4 years ago