Answer:
Ethnocentrism
Explanation:
What's professor Zhang is doing is a clear case of ethnocentrism. this is given that she's using the standard and customs of the place where she's from to judge how people should behave in a different culture. ethnocentrism gives one the belief that his or her culture is better than that of others. such a word is often used where issues of ethnicity of concern.
Since people from her culture do not go on a first-name basis, she believes that wherever she is no one should call her by her first name else the person is disrespectful.
Keynesians agree with the above statement, but monetarists do not.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Monetary policy is nothing but a policy followed by the central bank or any other banking agencies' authorities. As they can include control of money supply and interest rate that in turn helps the government to create growth in economic.
Keynesians also believe in the fact money supply has some relation with the growth f the country’s economy. They literally don’t mind about the rate of interest and the time provided to it. But Monetarists strongly believe in controlling the money in the economy.
Answer:
By the end of the 1940s the number of broadcast languages had expanded and reception had improved, following the opening of a relay in modern-day Malaysia and of the Limassol relay in Cyprus in 1957. On 1 May 1965 the service took its current name of BBC World Service.
Answer:
Pros:
1) The system is a representative democracy, like most of the Western world. That means you get to elect your government and share in the power. Nice.
2) The system is more focused on individuals and their opinions. You elect a president, not a party or a bloc. I can't say that I'd like that to happen in my own country, but it seems like a good fit for America.
3) The concept of legislative, judicial and executive powers go back a long way and it's generally a good idea that the three keep each other checked. This isn't limited to the US system though. We use it Europe too.
Cons:
1) All Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the President, which means he to a degree has authority over the Supreme Court, the judicial branch of the government
2) You have a two party system in which it is practically impossible to start a new party and get voted into your parliament. In Denmark, where I'm from, new parties come and go all the time. You just have to get 20.000 people to sign a document, then you're good to go and they can elect you into the Folketing. This means every segment of the country is represented, not just conservatives (Republicans) and moderate liberals (Democrats)
3) The US is made up of 51 different states, if I'm not wrong. And you collect all of the votes separately, which means that a state is either Republican or Democrat. This renders the votes of the minorities in these states entirely useless. All of the democrat votes in Texas aren't going to matter, when the majority votes Republican. In Denmark, the minority blue-bloc voters in Region Hovedstaden still get a say in the election.
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
The Mayflower Compact, signed by 41 English colonists on the ship Mayflower on November 11, 1620, was the first written framework of government established in what is now the United States.
