The state government because it is different in every state therefore the state government decides
If this is the same question, the answer is psychoanalytic.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The causes of the sources of discord in early New England were basically the Kings Philip War and the Halfway Covenant. Both were the most threatening for the New England colony could have been handled better.
The Halfway Covenant was the solution implemented by the Puritans in New England in 1657 to baptize children to be members of the church and could have political rights. This decision created controversy and some colonists opposed it. They thought it was not the correct way to convert people to be part of the Church. The Covenant was discarded at the beginning of the great awakening.
The other major problem was the Kings Philip War, also known as the First Indian War, that started in 1675 and ended in 1678. The Native American Indian tribes of New England fought for their lands and privileges while English colonists and some Indian allies tried to settle in different territories to work the land. The war ended when both parts signed the Casco Bay Treaty that formally ended the hostilities in April 1678.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
Answer:
Hong Xiuquan first began preaching his own interpretation of Christianity among his closest circle and began to attract many followers, including a similar organisation in the neighbouring province of Guangxi. There, a large population of peasants, of whom many were Hakka, found hope and purpose in Hong’s vision.
Explanation:
Hong’s rebels expanded into neighbouring districts, and on Jan. 1, 1851, Hong’s 37th birthday, he proclaimed his new dynasty, the Taiping Tianguo (“Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace”) and assumed the title of Tianwang, or “Heavenly King.” The Taipings pressed north through the fertile Yangtze River (Chang Jiang) valley.
Hong showed peasant rebellion could work in the modern age. This was one of the lessons the Communists took from the Taipings. The two rebellions in fact had much in common, but - one key difference - while Hong started lucky and got unlucky, Mao had it the other way round.
After leaving Roberts, Hong joined Feng and the God Worshippers and was immediately accepted as the new leader of the group. Conditions in the countryside were deplorable, and sentiment ran high against the Qing dynasty rulers. As a result, Hong and Feng began to plot the rebellion that finally began in July 1850.
