<span>The answer is B. Posting the date.
Here's the sequence of posting procedures.
First, Posting the date.
Second, posting the amount of the transactions.
Third,posting the page number of the journal in the Post. Ref. column of the ledger account.
And lastly, recording the posting ref. information</span>
A business operated by state legally...... is called corporation
Answer:
ROI = net profit / total investment
1. What is the current return on investment (ROI) being realized by your division
- ROI = $625,000 / $4,150,000 = 15.06%
2. What would happen to the near-term ROI of your division after adding the effect of the new investment?
- ROI = ($625,000 + $50,000) / ($4,150,000 + $550,000) = 14.36%
If you carry out the new project the ROI of your division will decrease.
3. As manager of this division, given your incentive compensation plan, would you be motivated to make the new investment?
- Even though the new project's return (9.1%) is considered acceptable by upper management, you will probably reject it since it will decrease your division's total ROI. When managers are assigned bonuses based on certain achievements, reducing your profitability ratio will probably result in no bonus.
Answer: Yes. AudioCable should buy a new equipment
Explanation:
Audiocables Inc. without new equipment:
Selling price: $1.40
Variable cost: $0.50
Fixed cost: $14,000
Sales: 30000 units
Total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost
= $14000 + ($0.50 × 30000)
= $14000 + $15000
= $29000
Revenue = Sales × Selling price
= 30000 × $1.40
= $42000
Profit = Revenue - Total Cost
= $42000 - $29000
= $13000
Audiocables Inc. with new equipment:
Selling price: $1.40
Variable cost: $0.60
Fixed cost: $14,000 + $6000 = $20000
Sales: 50000 units
Total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost
= $20000 + ($0.60 × 50000)
= $20000 + $30000
= $50000
Revenue = Sales × Selling price
= 50000 × $1.40
= $70000
Profit = Revenue - Total Cost
= $70000 - $50000
= $20000
From the calculations made, AudioCable buy a new equipment as profit generated is more.
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
