Assume the smaller one is x, then the other ones will be x+2 and x+4
x(x+2) + 2 = 5(x+4)
x^2 + 2x - 5x - 18 = 0
-> x^2 - 3x - 18 = 0
-> (x-6)(x+3) = 0
-> x = 6 or -3, since x must be positive, then x = 6
So the numbers are: 6, 8, 10
Answer:
(1/2 inch) / (3/4 hour) = 1/2 * 4/3 inches/hour = 2/3 inches/hour
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
42/54 = 6*7/6*9 = 7/9
7/9 = 42/54
Answer:
The best way of writing this answer in an inequality pattern is 50 ≤ x ≥ 70
Step-by-step explanation:
The variable "x" is said to be greater than or equal to 50, that means that x could be 50, 51, 52, 53, 54......to infinity, all these values are true for x.
The second solution said x is greater or equal to 70. This also means that x could be 70, 71, 72, 73, ......... to infinity.
The inference that can be drawn from here is that x actually started from 50, so anything lesser than 50 is lesser than x, so 50 ≤ x. We can join the two answers together to get a range in a form like: 50 ≤ x ≥ 70
<span>Randomly generate an integer from 1 to 7 two times, and the probability is 1/7 ^2
This is the </span><span>statement that best describes the use of a simulation to predict the probability that two randomly chosen people will both have their birthdays on a Monday.
There are 7 days in a week, so there are 7 choices but only 1 Monday. So, 1/7 is the probability that a person's birthday falls on a Monday.
1st person asked will have 1/7 probability.
2nd person asked will also have 1/7 probability
So, (1/7)</span>² is the probability that both persons will have their birthdays on a Monday.
