Answer:
I believe it is D
Explanation:
since Rutherford's explanation, when he made it in 1911, was that scattering was caused by a hard, dense court to centre of the Adam, which is the nucleus and he used Alpha particles to observe the scattered backwards from a gold foil
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, since the pH defines the concentration of hydrogen:
![pH=-log([H^+])](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pH%3D-log%28%5BH%5E%2B%5D%29)
![[H^+]=10^{-pH}=10^{-3.4}=3.98x10^{-4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BH%5E%2B%5D%3D10%5E%7B-pH%7D%3D10%5E%7B-3.4%7D%3D3.98x10%5E%7B-4%7D)
And the percent ionization is:
![\% \ ionization=\frac{[H^+]}{[HA]}*100\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%25%20%5C%20ionization%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D%2A100%5C%25)
We compute the concentration of the acid, HA:
![[HA]=\frac{[H^+]}{\% \ ionization}*100\%=\frac{3.98x10^{-4}}{66\%} *100\%\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BHA%5D%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%7D%7B%5C%25%20%5C%20ionization%7D%2A100%5C%25%3D%5Cfrac%7B3.98x10%5E%7B-4%7D%7D%7B66%5C%25%7D%20%20%2A100%5C%25%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![[HA]=6.03x10^{-4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BHA%5D%3D6.03x10%5E%7B-4%7D)
Thus, the Ka is:
![Ka=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}=\frac{3.98x10^{-4}*3.98x10^{-4}}{6.03x10^{-4}}\\ \\Ka=2.63x10^{-4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ka%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B3.98x10%5E%7B-4%7D%2A3.98x10%5E%7B-4%7D%7D%7B6.03x10%5E%7B-4%7D%7D%5C%5C%20%20%5C%5CKa%3D2.63x10%5E%7B-4%7D)
So the pKa is:
Regards.
What are you asking???? If the formula had no atoms of oxygen then......
Answer:
The answer to your question is:
1.- CO
2.- 0.414 moles of CO2
Explanation:
Data
2CO + O2 ⇒ 2CO2
CO = 0.414 moles
O2 = 0.418
Process
theoretical ratio CO/O2 = 2/1 = 1
experimental ratio CO/O2 = 0.414/0.418 = 0.99
Then the limiting reactant is CO
2.-
2 moles of CO --------------- 2 moles of CO2
0.414 moles of CO --------- x
x = (0.414 x 2) / 2
x = 0.414 moles of CO2
