1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
4 years ago
10

A student is attempting to simplify the expression below. Sample mathematical work is shown. Which statement best applies to the

sample mathematical work?
Given xy+yx+x-3(x+y), I first apply the distributive property, which yields the expression xy + yx + x – 3x – 3y. I can then collect like terms: since x – 3x = –2x, I have the expression xy + yx – 2x – 3y as my final answer.
A.
The student failed to properly apply the distributive property.
B.
The student collected two or more terms that were not like terms.
C.
The student failed to collect all like terms.
D.
The mathematical work shown above is correct.
Mathematics
1 answer:
12345 [234]4 years ago
4 0
The answer is A) The student failed to properly apply the distributive property.
You might be interested in
Consider two competing firms in a declining industry that cannot support both firms profitably. Each firm has three possible cho
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

a) attached below

b)  ( T,T )

c) The Pure-strategy Nash equilibria are : ( N,E ) and ( E,N )

d) The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for Firm 1 = ( 1/3 , 0, 2/3 )

while the mixed -strategy Nash equilibrium for Firm 2 = ( 1/3 , 0, 2/3 )

Step-by-step explanation:

A) write down the game in matrix form

let: E = exit at the industry immediately

     T = exit at the end of the quarter

     N = exit at the end of the next quarter

matrix is attached below

B) weakly dominated strategies is ( T,T )

C) Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria

The Pure-strategy Nash equilibria are : ( N,E ) and ( E,N )

D ) Find the unique mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium

The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for Firm 1 = ( 1/3 , 0, 2/3 )

while the mixed -strategy Nash equilibrium for Firm 2 = ( 1/3 , 0, 2/3 ) since T is weakly dominated then the mixed strategy will be NE

Assume that P is the probability of firm 1 exiting immediately ( E )

and q is the probability of firm 1 staying till next term ( N ) ∴ q = 1 - P.

hence the expected utility of firm 2 choosing E = 0 while the expected utility of choosing N = 4p - 2q .

The expected utilities of E and N to firm 2 =

0 = 4p - 2q = 4p - 2 ( 1-p) = 6p -2 which means : p = 1/3 , q = 2/3

4 0
3 years ago
________________________
xenn [34]

✩ Answer:

 ✧・゚: *✧・゚:*✧・゚: *✧・゚:*✧・゚: *✧・゚:*  

 \bold{Hello!}\\\bold{Your~answer~is~below!}  

✩ Step-by-step explanation:

 ✧・゚: *✧・゚:*✧・゚: *✧・゚:*✧・゚: *✧・゚:*

✺ Divide both sides by −3. Since −3 is negative, the inequality direction is changed:

  • -3 ÷ -3 = Cancels Out
  • Turns into: \frac{-9}{-3} >5x-2

✺ Divide −9 by −3 to get 3. Since they are both negatives it turns into a positive:

  • -9 ÷ -3 = 3
  • Turns into: 3 > 5x - 2

✺ Swap sides so that all variable terms are on the left hand side. This changes the sign direction once more:

  • Turns into: 5x-2

✺ Add 2 to both sides:

  • Turns into: 5x

✺ Add 3 and 2 to get 5:

  • 3 + 2 = 5
  • Turns into: 5x

✺ Divide both sides by 5. Since 5 is positive, the inequality direction remains the same:

  • 5 ÷ 5 = Cancels Out
  • Turns into: x

✺ Divide 5 by 5 to get 1:

  • 5 ÷ 5 = 1

✺  So your answer is B, \boxed{x.

(Number line is below.)

Hope~this~helps~and,\\Best~of~luck!\\\\~~~~~-TotallyNotTrillex

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me I can’t get this wrong it would mean a lot
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:it should be D

Step-by-step explanation: he was a MAJOR player in by creating so many poems, music, and other arts. He was a huge player and created something else too. He pioneered jazz as well.

5 0
3 years ago
Tell how the Communicative property of addition and the Associative property of addition can help solve the problem mentally 8+(
topjm [15]

Step-by-step explanation:

Communicative property states that, in addition, integers added in any order will still give the same answer.

So in this question,

rather than first adding 8 + (-5), we add 8 + (-8)

We know that a number + its additive Inverse (opposite sign) is equal to zero

And we know any number added to zero is equal to the number.

So we can quickly find out that the sum is -5

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression is equivalent to 91+39 ?
KIM [24]

Answer:

130

Step-by-step explanation:

i think

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you solve g= y-c+x for x
    14·2 answers
  • What is 2x22x2x2x2x2x2x2x2
    5·2 answers
  • Find the missing term and the missing coefficient 6a −( )5a =( ) a2 − 35a
    11·1 answer
  • I need to know are these lines parallel, perpendicular, or neither?!
    13·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS ASAP 16 = 2^x − 2 <br><br>a)2 <br><br>b)4 <br><br>c)6 <br><br>d)8
    7·1 answer
  • *20 points*
    14·1 answer
  • A sample of a radioactive isotope had an initial mass of 450 mg in the year 2005 and decays exponentially over time. A measureme
    11·1 answer
  • Solve for the perimeter and keep it in pi
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following relations represent a function?
    5·2 answers
  • Elimination method<br> x+4y=1<br> -3x-5y=-10
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!