Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
False. I need 20 characters so I will just spam ⛑☺️
My answer would be false.
Humans are not always subjected to the same limited factors because they
have intellect. They find ways to get by
when the need to solve these limits arises.
They do not let themselves be controlled by the elements but find ways
to get around these factors.
June 17, 1775
American won this battle because they used the geography to their advantage. Before General Washington was about to start, General William Prescot had already led the troops to the Hill. On the hill they could shoot down at the British, making the British troops an easy target.
Answer:
Option B I guess
Explanation:
If it correct give me brainliest
