Answer:
Fx = 32.14 [N]
Fy = 38.3 [N]
Explanation:
To solve this problem we must decompose the force vector, for this we will use the angle of 50 degrees measured from the horizontal component.
F = 50 [N]
Fx = 50*cos(50) = 32.14 [N]
Fy = 50*sin(50) = 38.3 [N]
We can verify this result using the Pythagorean theorem.
![F = \sqrt{(32.14)^{2}+ (38.3)^{2}} \\F = 50 [N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%2832.14%29%5E%7B2%7D%2B%20%2838.3%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%20%5C%5CF%20%3D%2050%20%5BN%5D)
Answer:
a)0.024
b)0.148
Explanation:
Let 's represent the set of deer ticks Carrying Lyme disease with L and the set of deer ticks carrying Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis with H
Given:
P(L) = 0.16
P(H) = 0.10
P(L n H) = 0.1 ·P( L u H )
Hence, P( L u H) = 10 ·P( L nH)
(a)
Hence. using the equation. P(L U H) = P(L) + P(H) - P(L n H)
Hence, 10 · P(L n H ) = 0.16 + 0.1 - P(L n H )
Hence, 11 · P(L n H) = 0.16 + 0.1 = 0.26
Hence, P(L n H) =
0.26/11=0.024
(b)
We know that condition probability P(H ║ L) = p(L n H)/P(L)
hence, P(H ║ L) =(0.26/11)/0.16 =0.148
Newton's second law of motion can be formally stated as follows: The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Due to the shortcomings in Piaget’s approach to cognitive development several other theories were put forward.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Jean Piaget is the psychologist that offered explanations about cognitive development in children. There were several shortcomings in his theories and thus alternative theories about cognitive <em>development in children </em>were developed.
<em>Lev Vygotsky</em> proposed another explanation to children’s cognitive development. He strongly emphasized on the influence of culture on <em>children’s cognitive development</em>. He believes that it is through socio-cultural interactions development progresses.
He believed that individualized thoughts begin after these interactions. He take on <em>self-speech </em> was different from Piaget. Vygotsky considered self-speech as a guide to thinking while Piaget thought <em>self-speech to be egocentric. </em>
