Answer:
The YTM is 6.45%
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity.
Face value = F = $1,000
Coupon payment = $1,000 x 7% = $70
Selling price = P = $1,038.50
Number of payment = n = 9 years
Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $70 + ( $1,000 - $1,038.5 ) / 9 ] / [ (1,000 + $1,038.5 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $70 - $4.28 ] / $1,019.25 = $65.72 /$1,019.25 = 0.0645 = 6.45%
Answer:
Current year = 204%
Prior year = 100%
Explanation:
Detailed solution is given below
Answer:6 kanban containers are needed
Explanation: Using the formula
Number of kanban containers =( dL + S)/C
Where
Average demand, d = 200
Lead time, L = 2 days
Safety stock is 1 day, S = 200 units
Quantity in containers, C = 100
Number of kanban containers = dL + S/C
= (200 x 2 + 200)/ 100 =400+200/100
= 600/100 = 6
Therefore 6 kanban containers are needed
This statement is true. As there is the growing emphasis on the strategic supply management processes and less on the purchase transactions.
Effective interpretation of corporate and supplier objectives, selection of appropriate actions to achieve objectives and integration of inventory information into organizational strategies. hiring professionals trained specifically in supply management, providing them with technical knowledge and long-term leadership development. emphasizing strategic cost management, engaging key suppliers early in the process, and measuring reductions in total cost of ownership. Supply management has evolved from a process-oriented, strategic function to a transactional, tactical function. The reduction in inventory investment comes primarily from users reducing their demand for stocked items. Therefore the statement is true.
Learn more about supply management.
brainly.com/question/25843620
#SPJ4
The answer is objective personality test.
Objective personality test is designed to measures the personality of a certain individual without being exposed to the bias of the tester.
To fully avoid the bias, the researchers usually created a scoring system that based on quantitative scores rather than the qualitative.
