Answer:
$259.34
Explanation:
the value of the stock can be determined using the two stage dividend discount model.
In the first stage, the present value would be determined using a discount rate of 18%.
In the second stage, the present value would be determined using a discount rate of 6%.
Values from the first and second stage would be added together to determine the value of the stock
First stage
Present value in year 1 = ($3.2 x 1.18) / 1.087 = $3.47
Present value in year 2 = ($3.2 x 1.18²) / 1.087² = $3.77
Present value in year 3 = ($3.2 x 1.18³) / 1.087³ = $4.09
Present value in year 4 = ($3.2 x 1.18^4) / 1.087^4 = $4.44
Second stage
($3.2 x 1.18^4 x 1.06) / (0.087 - 0.06) = 243.57
Value of the stock = $3.47 + $3.77 + $4.09 + $4.44 + 243.57 = $259.34
Answer:
Yes they are sustainable
Explanation:
The strategies mentioned in the question were laid out my Michael Porter and therefore, we can look analyse his model to understand whether these strategies are sustainable or not.
Porter has categorized strategies into 3 broad categories: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus strategies (all three are known as "Generic Strategies). Focus strategy is branched out into two sub-segments known as Cost Focus and Differentiation Focus.
Now, the question has already clarified that the strategies in question are both focus strategies. So lets understand what each entails.
Differentiation Focus: A strategy in which the company aims to gain market leadership in a focused market (a specific market) through strategic differentiaion. This strategic differentiaion involves offering a specialized service or a unique product in a niche market. Cost focus strategy is similar in the sense is that that the aim is to offer highly low cost products/services to a niche market. Because of the focus on these niche markets, company's develop a strong understansing of the consumer thereby developing strong brand loyalty with that particular customer base. The key ingredient, again, is that the competitive advantage is being harnessed by focusing just on a particular niche market. Another key component is that the companies using this strategy rely on the consumers in the target market having different needs, tastes, and requirements than consumers in other segments in the industry.
Now, these strategies by desig were put forth my Porter has being sustainable. Hence the term "generic strategies" in that they can be broadly used to create and sustain performance. The focus strategies as defined above are sustainable since they harness the power of having priority knowledge of their target market to provide appropriate services and products. The high brand loyalty and knowledge of consumers give them an edge over competitors (competitive rivalry). Supplier power depends on the nature of products being offered therefore it cant be taken into consideration. Buyer power can be managed since you are prodiving unique service offerings to unique customers. Threat of substitution depends on the product and service offering. Threat of new entry by larger player exists, but due to the focus that the company had in the target market, barriers to entry (long strong brand loyalty) can be developed.
Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
If at a given time of the day, the state road 408 is higly congested, then it could be considered to possess the properties of a COMMON PROPERTY GOOD.
There are four types of economic goods, these are: public goods, private goods, common property goods and club good.
Common properties goods are those goods which are characterised by rival consumption and non exclusion of non payers. Rival consumption implies that consumption by a user imposes limitations on what others can consume, but a user can not stop another user from enjoying the good. Common property goods are equally owned by everyone and are not controlled by anyone in particular, thus these goods usually need government intervention.
