Answer:
The answer is <u>B</u><u>o</u><u>t</u><u>t</u><u>o</u><u>m</u> to <u>T</u><u>o</u><u>p</u>.
Explanation:
As magnetic field always move from North Pole to South Pole of the magnet.
Answer:
Option (a)
Explanation:
We will discard options that don't fit the situation:
Option b: <em>Incorrect </em>since if the driver "hits the gas" then velocity is augmenting and it's not constant.
Option c and d: <em>Incorrect </em>since the situation doesn't give us any information that could be related directly to the terrain or movement direction.
Option a: Correct. At <em>stage 1</em> we can assume the driver was going at constant speed which means acceleration is constantly zero. At <em>stage 2 </em>we can assume the driver augmented speed linearly, this is, with constant positive acceleration. At <em>stage 3 </em>we can assume the driver slowed the speed linearly, with constant negative acceleration.
False. That description fits the wave's 'frequency'.
It has nothing to do with refraction.
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply an energy balance equation in each of the states to assess what their respective relationship is.
By definition the energy balance is simply given by the change between the two states:
Our states are given by
In this way the energy balance for the states would be given by,
Therefore the states of energy would be
Lowest : 0.9eV
Middle :7.5eV
Highest: 8.4eV
