He coordinates of the vertices of △JKL are J(3, 0) , K(1, −2) , and L(6, −2) . The coordinates of the vertices of △J′K′L′ are J′
(−3, 1) , K′(−1, 3) , and L′(−6, 3) .
Which statement correctly describes the relationship between △JKL and △J′K′L′ ?
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a translation 1 unit up followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a reflection across the x-axis followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is not congruent to △J′K′L′ because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △JKL to △J′K′L′.
Which statement correctly describes the relationship between △JKL and △J′K′L′ ?
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a translation 1 unit up followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a reflection across the x-axis followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
△JKL is not congruent to △J′K′L′ because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △JKL to △J′K′L′.
2 answers:
Answer:
As Given :The coordinates of the vertices of △JKL are J(3, 0) , K(1, −2) , and L(6, −2) . The coordinates of the vertices of △J′K′L′ are J′(−3, 1) , K′(−1, 3) , and L′(−6, 3) .
⇒As we can see the two triangles are congruent because length of sides are equal.i.e By SSS ΔJKL and ΔJ'K'L' are congruent.
⇒ As you can see from the figure depicted below the triangle JKL is rotated by an angle of 180° then translation of y coordinate by 1 unit up has taken place.
So , Option (3) is correct which is :△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.
Check the picture:
Rotating JKL 180° with respect to the origin, and translating it 1 unit up, we get J'K'L'.
That is, the 2 triangles match perfectly.
Answer:
<span>△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.</span>
Rotating JKL 180° with respect to the origin, and translating it 1 unit up, we get J'K'L'.
That is, the 2 triangles match perfectly.
Answer:
<span>△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.</span>
You might be interested in
We start by calculating the assessed value, that is 41% of the price.
The price is $92,000.
Then, the assessed value is:
The property tax rate is $39.50 per $1000 of assessed value, so we can express this rate as:
We then can multiply this rate by the assessed value to calculate the total property tax:
NOTE: we could have also multiplied 39.50 by 37.72. The value 37.72 is the thousands of dollars of assessed value. We would have obtained the same result: 39.50*37.72=1489.94.
Answer: the property tax is $1,489.94.