1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
13

Explain why it works to break apart a number by place values to multiply

Mathematics
2 answers:
Tomtit [17]3 years ago
6 0
Because you are still multiplying the same vaules of the number you are multiplying in it's standard form
IrinaK [193]3 years ago
3 0
Idononoooont know boi
You might be interested in
If the example is y= -2x and y= x+3 Does the point (2,5) make either equation true?
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

the second one is true

Step-by-step explanation:

5=-4. 2nd one 5=5

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the extended form find the perimeter of the square shape of 10cm and 18cm
dexar [7]
The perimeter of the square would be 56 cm
3 0
3 years ago
One bridge is 4260ft and the other is 760ft. What is the length?
pentagon [3]

The total length of the two bridges is 5020 ft.

In order to find the combined length of these two bridges, simply add the two numbers together.

4260 + 760 = 5020.

8 0
4 years ago
Question down here or up cant really see if cant see tell me or not​
yuradex [85]

this will be a equilateral triangle

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In recent years more people have been working past the age of 65. In 2005, 27% of people aged 65–69 worked. A recent report from
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

a) point estimate is 30%

b) null and alternative hypothesis would be

H_{0}: p=27%

H_{a}: p>27%

c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>a. </em>

Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals \frac{180}{600}=0.3 ie 30%

<em>b.</em>

Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be

H_{0}: p=27%

H_{a}: p>27%

<em>c.</em>

z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:

\frac{p(s)-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p*(1-p)}{N} } } where

  • p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
  • p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
  • N is the sample size (600)

then z=\frac{0.3-0.27}{\sqrt{\frac{0.27*0.73}{600} } } = 1.655

Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain how to find which is greater 1/4 of 12 of 1/3 of 12
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose an investment of $5,000 doubles every 12 years. How much is the investment worth after 36 years? After 48 years?
    9·1 answer
  • A membership to gym A costs $42 plus $1 per visit. A membership to gym B costs $18 plus $4 per visit. After x visits, the cost o
    15·1 answer
  • Use transformations to solve the equation
    6·1 answer
  • Which expression is undefined? A. -8 divided by -8 B. -8 divided by 8 C. 0 divided by 8 D. 8 divided by 0
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the coefficient of the term -9c<br> 1. C<br> 2. -c<br> 3. 9 <br> 4. -9
    5·1 answer
  • Find the value of x in kite EFGH<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • Need help on this question plz and thank you
    6·2 answers
  • Which expressions represent 1 more than the product of 5 and 2?
    11·2 answers
  • Help pls ! <br> (Don’t type just to type)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!