Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50
Answer:
a. $28.5
b. 12.28%
c. $29.18
d. 13.09%
Explanation:
a. let current price = p
p*1.10 = 2(1-0.3)+30
= 1.4+30/1.10
= 31.4/1.10
= 28.5
the current price of the stock is approximately 28.5 dollars
b. (30+2 /28.5)-1
= 32/28.5 - 1
= 0.1228
= 12.28%
expected before tax rate is 12.28%
c. 3(1-0.3)+30 / 1.10
= 3*0.7+30/1.10
= $29.18
d. before tax rate of return
= (3$ + 30-29.18)/29.18
= 0.1309
= 13.09%
it is now higher here given that given that a greater dividend causes more tax burden.
Answer:
Long term liabilities.
Explanation:
This can be easily or mostly be used in companies and also firms. In most cases they are been tagged a non-current liability.
They are generally defined to be obligations that are not been settled for/paid off in the current year or accounting period. Therefore, debts of this kind are not due within a year. Dept of this kind ranges from notes payable to bonds payable, also mortgages and are also seen as leases in a company settings.
In as much as this is not good for a company's financial health, investors and creditors see how the company is financed through this. Current obligations are seen to be more risky than non-current debts because they will need to be paid sooner.
You would see "<span>b. a decrease in the demand for chocolate pudding".</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": I, II and III.
Explanation:
Portfolio Turnover estimates the fund's percentage of assets that its manager buys and sells for over one year. <em>Portfolio turnover can affect the return of the portfolio, as transaction costs such as commissions and fees are drawn from the assets of the fund</em>. Usually, fund managers who trade securities aggressively try to increase their commission.
<em>Higher portfolio turnover rates imply incurring in higher capital gains translated in higher returns overall but come along with higher taxes that must be paid equally among investors. Both benefits and liabilities are allocated evenly among entrepreneurs into the investment.</em>
