Answer:
b. both firms will reduce their price.
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant
So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price
hence the option b is correct
Are opinion would not matter and the country would not be free.
Or violence if they chose someone that nobody agrees with.
Hope this helps!
I don't think so cause they are both different companies. <span />
It's 16.282. ok I don't think for sure though
This is an example of<u> "deductive reasoning".</u>
Deductive reasoning is a coherent procedure in which a conclusion depends on the concordance of numerous premises that are commonly thought to be valid.
Deductive reasoning is sometimes alluded to as top-down logic. Its partner, inductive thinking, is some of the time alluded to as base up rationale. Where deductive thinking continues from general premises to an explicit end, inductive thinking continues from explicit premises to a general end.
