The answer is x= y-5 /m
See the picture for explanation plz
<span>Simplifying
(x + 3)(x + 2)
Reorder the terms:
(3 + x)(x + 2)
Reorder the terms:
(3 + x)(2 + x)
Multiply (3 + x) * (2 + x)
(3(2 + x) + x(2 + x))
((2 * 3 + x * 3) + x(2 + x))
((6 + 3x) + x(2 + x))
(6 + 3x + (2 * x + x * x))
(6 + 3x + (2x + x2))
Combine like terms: 3x + 2x = 5x
(6 + 5x + x2)
Factor a trinomial.
(3 + x)(2 + x)
Final result:
(3 + x)(2 + x)</span>
First of all, the modular inverse of n modulo k can only exist if GCD(n, k) = 1.
We have
130 = 2 • 5 • 13
231 = 3 • 7 • 11
so n must be free of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, which are the first six primes. It follows that n = 17 must the least integer that satisfies the conditions.
To verify the claim, we try to solve the system of congruences

Use the Euclidean algorithm to express 1 as a linear combination of 130 and 17:
130 = 7 • 17 + 11
17 = 1 • 11 + 6
11 = 1 • 6 + 5
6 = 1 • 5 + 1
⇒ 1 = 23 • 17 - 3 • 130
Then
23 • 17 - 3 • 130 ≡ 23 • 17 ≡ 1 (mod 130)
so that x = 23.
Repeat for 231 and 17:
231 = 13 • 17 + 10
17 = 1 • 10 + 7
10 = 1 • 7 + 3
7 = 2 • 3 + 1
⇒ 1 = 68 • 17 - 5 • 231
Then
68 • 17 - 5 • 231 ≡ = 68 • 17 ≡ 1 (mod 231)
so that y = 68.
Answer:
The slope would flip along with the sign so it would be 2x
Answer:
yeah i think maybe about 28 pancakes
Step-by-step explanation: