Answer and Step-by-step explanation: Spherical coordinate describes a location of a point in space: one distance (ρ) and two angles (Ф,θ).To transform cartesian coordinates into spherical coordinates:


For angle θ:
- If x > 0 and y > 0:
;
- If x < 0:
; - If x > 0 and y < 0:
;
Calculating:
a) (4,2,-4)
= 6
For θ, choose 1st option:
b) (0,8,15)
= 17


The angle θ gives a tangent that doesn't exist. Analysing table of sine, cosine and tangent: θ = 
c) (√2,1,1)
= 2

= 

d) (−2√3,−2,3)
= 5

Since x < 0, use 2nd option:



Cilindrical coordinate describes a 3 dimension space: 2 distances (r and z) and 1 angle (θ). To express cartesian coordinates into cilindrical:

Angle θ is the same as spherical coordinate;
z = z
Calculating:
a) (4,2,-4)
= 

z = -4
b) (0, 8, 15)
= 8

z = 15
c) (√2,1,1)
= 

z = 1
d) (−2√3,−2,3)
= 4

z = 3
Answer:
The value of x = -1 makes the denominator of the function equal to zero. That is why this value is not included in the domain of f(x)
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following expression

Since the division between zero is not defined then the function f(x) can not include the values of x that make the denominator of the function zero.
Now we search that values of x make 0 the denominator factoring the polynomial 
We need two numbers that when adding them get as a result -1 and when multiplying those numbers, obtain -2 as a result.
These numbers are -2 and 1
Then the factors are:

We do the same with the numerator

We need two numbers that when adding them get as a result 4 and when multiplying those numbers, obtain 3 as a result.
These numbers are 3 and 1
Then the factors are:

Therefore

Note that
only if 
So since
is not included in the domain the function has a discontinuity in 
There are 5820 ft per mile
so the answer is 5820ft/min
Hope this helps!
Answer: $15.94
Step-by-step explanation:
Let r be your rate you get paid per hour normally. Let's set up this equation.
(30 * r) + 4(1.5 * r) = 573.83
30r + 6r = 573.83
36r = 573.83
r = 15.94 (rounded)
You get paid $15.94 hourly.
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .