Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
D. $ 10,300
Choice D is correct: Net income = $ 10,300
Explanation:
Cash Received = $ 16000
Less Rent Paid= ( $ 2000)
Add income = $ 3000
Less Salaries for the month of March = ($ 6200)
Less utilities paid ($ <u>500)</u>
<u>Net income=</u> $ 10,300
Treatments.
Net income is found by deducting expenses from revenues earned
$ 100,000 is the retained earnings so it is not accounted for net income.
Equipment is an asset so it is not accounted for net income.
Cash received is the revenue so it is accounted.
Rent is an expense account so it is subtracted.
Income for service $ 3000 provided is also taken into account on matching principle basis.
Advance received will be adjusted when the services will be rendered on matching principle.
Answer:
Combined Beta = 1
Combined return = 10%
Explanation:
given data
stock portfolio = $50,000
beta = 1.2
expected return = 10.8%
beta = 0.8
expected return = 9.2%
standard deviation = 25%
to find out
combination
solution
we get here first Combined Beta that is express as
Combined Beta = 1.2 × 50% + 0.8 × 50%
Combined Beta = 1
and
Combined return will be here
Combined return = 10.8 × 50% + 9.2 × 50%
Combined return = 10%
When sales exceed production, the net operating income reported under variable costing generally will be <u>greater than the net operating income reported under absorption costing</u>.
Under variable costing, constant manufacturing overhead fee is handled as product cost. If the range of devices produced exceeds the range of gadgets sold, then net operating income under absorption costing will: be extra than net operating earnings underneath variable costing.
Variable costing is a concept used in managerial and cost accounting wherein the fixed production overhead is excluded from the product price of manufacturing. The technique contrasts with absorption costing, in which the fixed manufacturing overhead is allotted to products produced.
Absorption costing, once in a while known as “full costing,” is a managerial accounting technique for taking pictures of all prices associated with manufacturing a selected product. The direct and oblique costs, together with direct substances, direct exertions, leases, and insurance, are accounted for with the aid of the use of this method.
Learn more about Absorption costing here brainly.com/question/26276034
#SPJ4
Answer:a credit to Interest revenue for $200
Explanation:
Interest = Principal x rate x time ( period )
= $10,000 x 6% x 120/360
=$200
Account titles and explanation Debit Credit
Cash $10,200
Note receivable $10,000
Interest revenue $200
Therefore, The journal entry that Teal would make to record payment of this note would include a credit to Interest revenue for $200
