At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
Answer:
arbitration
Explanation:
Arbitration -
It is a type of alternative dispute resolution ( ADR ),
As it suggests , it enables to solve any conflict outside the court , is referred to as arbitration .
In United states , the method is very commonly used , where it is compulsory with the process of employment .
In certain scenarios , a third party is used for solve the issue , where the party need to be neutral from both the ends .
The method is employed in order to solve some commercial issues , in reference to the international commercial transactions .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct term is Arbitration.
Answer:
The answer is Trusted the president was obscuring the partition of forces set up by the constitution.
Explanation:
The partition of forces gives an arrangement of shared power known as Checks and Balances. Three branches are made in the Constitution. The Legislative, made out of the House and Senate, is set up in Article 1. The Executive, made out of the President, Vice-President, and the Departments, is set up in Article 2.Montesquieu characterize the essential parts of the administration to be the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Aristocrat Montesquieu being a judge himself, plainly characterized the Judicial as being separate from the official and autonomous of the other two branches.
Answer:
10 minutes
Explanation:
Mika can eat 21 hot dogs in 6 minutes and she wants to know how many minutes it will take her to eat 35 hot dogs.
This is a problem that can be used establishing a ratio. We know that she can eat 21 hot dogs in 6 minutes, therefore her ratio would be: 
Now if she wants to know how many minutes it will take her to eat 35 hot dogs we can establish another radio where x will be the number of minutes it will take her: 
Since the problem tells us that she can keep up the same pace when eating the 35 hot dogs, <u>we can make those two radios equal to one another and solve for x: </u>
Thus, it will take her 10 minutes to eat 35 hot dogs.
Answer:
A project charter
Explanation:
Great way to stay organized
