Answer:
Iraq retreated from Kuwait
Explanation: (2 august 1990 - 28 february 1991).
Answer:
A good deed has it's own reward because it is a good deed. If you do something to help someone that makes you feel good about yourself. You don't always need to be rewarded for something you do because the idea that you helped someone in need of help should be enough. If yowalwalijg down the street and see a homeless man and you decide to give him 100 dollars that's a good deed that greatly helped him. you should be satisfied with the idea that you greatly improved someone's day even if it took your money. Let's say you were at school and you saw a kid that looked sad and was sitting alone and you go to talk to him. You don't expect anything form him or anyone your doing that beacsue your kind. That's my reason of why "A good deed has it's own reward.".
<u>Answer:
</u>
Priming one thought, even without awareness, can influence another thought, or an action and unnoticed events can subtly prime our thinking and behavior are TRUE statements.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The concept of priming of thoughts refers to one thought getting impacted by a stimulus produced by the other thought that is implanted from an extrinsic source.
- This influence of one thought on the other often causes an individual to change decisions regarding both significant or insignificant issues pertaining to events happening in day to day life.
Answer:
When there are conflicting decisions on the same issue by different court of appeals and when there is a rulling based on racial discrimination.
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is simply an order a higher court such as the Supreme Court gives for them to evaluate the decisions and processes in a lower court. This enables the higher court to ascertain if there are wrongdoings in the process. Cases have been brought to the U.S Supreme Court on a regular basis through this method and they have granted only about 1.1% of over a thousand cases.
Writ of certiorari can be issued when a court of appeals in the U.S has made a decision in court which is conflicting with the decision made by another court of appeals in the same country, on the same issue. The losing party in both scenarios here can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Also, where there is an appeal court ruling that does not favor a citizen on a basis of racial discrimination with no precedent, the decision can be appealed. Similar incident happened in the case by Ricky Brown, Raishawn Morris, Charles Battiste against the City of Oneonta, New work in which it was alleged that the enforcement officials carried their tasks while targeting minority members of the area for interrogation based on race.
