1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Molodets [167]
3 years ago
10

The president vetoes a law and the Supreme Court declares a law unconstitutional. What two principles are reflected here?

History
1 answer:
mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

b

federalism and separation of powers

Explanation:

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. ... Thus, national constitutions typically apply only to government actions.

The Framers of the Constitution gave the President the power to veto acts of Congress to prevent the legislative branch from becoming too powerful. This is an illustration of the separation of powers integral to the U.S. Constitution

You might be interested in
Who authorized an attack on Boer territories? A.David Livingstone B.Cecil Rhodes C. Benjamin Disraeli
guapka [62]
Cecil Rhodes authorized an attack on Boer territories.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is an example of using a network to communicate an idea? A) reading the news on the internet B) watching an onlin
Veronika [31]
D. sending a text messages on your cell phone
hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is this man an important historical figure? He helped the United States fight communism in Europe. He attempted a terrorist
tiny-mole [99]

Answer: C- He was the leader of Cuba’s communist revolution.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What can you learn from the heading of a court case?
aev [14]
B. The decision of the case
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should people without power use violence to make a change??
sp2606 [1]
It depends. You should first use means that aren’t drastic. Meaning you should kindly fight for the right to make a change. I don’t believe you should use violence tho. Violence when used to make a change can cause greed after u get that change.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do you now at least the first one please
    5·1 answer
  • How did disease, brought over by the Europeans affect the Native Americans?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Dawes Act of 1887 unsuccessful?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the result of president Taft’s “dollar diplomacy”?
    7·2 answers
  • 1. Where was Mayan civilization located?
    5·2 answers
  • After Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Group of answer choices many African Americans were elected to office at al
    9·1 answer
  • Who is most responsible for the rise of the Republican Party of Texas since the 1970's?
    15·1 answer
  • PLS HELP, I’LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    9·2 answers
  • The speaker describes some Americans as...
    9·1 answer
  • Match each thinker with the correct description
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!