Answer:
1.23
2.60
3.45
4.37.524 (Im not incredibly posotive ab this one)
5.28
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's look at the cost for members (C1) first. Let x be the number of visits.
C1(x) = 12 + 8x
For non-members (C2), we can do the same.
C2(x) = 10x
You can graph these two equations.
x C1 C2
0 12 0
1 20 10
2 28 20
3 36 30
4 44 40
5 52 50
6 60 60
7 68 70
Let's make the two equations equal, to find out where the benefit is the same.
12 + 8x = 10x
2x = 12
x = 6
Up to 5 visits, the non-member cost is better. At 6 visits, there's the same price. For more than 6 visits, the member cost is better.
3/4 is greater than 2/5. 2/5 is .4 and 3/4 is .75
It seems like the details of what p and q <em>are </em>in this context aren't all that important; it's the logical structure of the statement "p⇒q" we need to look at. We read that logical statement as "p implies q," where p is our <em>hypothesis</em> and q is our <em>conclusion</em>. When we take the converse of a logical statement, we reverse the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, <em>p </em>wouldn't imply <em>q</em>, but <em>q </em>would imply <em>p</em> in the converse of p⇒q. We'd write this statement as:
q⇒p
Answer:
Im trying to say the same thing
Step-by-step explanation:
