A is the answer to this question. Hope this helps.
Answer: Collective Bargaining Strategy
Explanation:
Every conflict is a breakdown of communication, and the stronger the personality the more likely there would soon be a breakdown in communication. The absence of conflict though could suggest tyranny in existence, but in the absence of tyranny and there is a high frequency of interpersonal disagreement between employees, then, COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY would work. This strategy helps to easily adopt a participatory style of management rather than an autocratic style because it creates an avenue for dialogue, taking part in decision making process as well as paving way for other integrative conflicts management strategies like; negotiation, accommodation, and negotiation.
the result of this illegal action was <span>Georgia was placed under military control the following year.
This decision was taken by Andrew Jhonson in order to ensure the southern states follow the reconstruction programs that created by the Republican Party.
Even after the military occupation was over, the racial tension that exists in the southern states still significantly greater compared to the northern states.</span>
Answer:
Probably not, because there would have been fewer (or no) points of dispute
Explanation:
Suppose that the original agreement between Amazon and Basis included a detailed schedule of payments to be made by Amazon to Basis for additional services. Would all the elements of this lawsuit been the same? Probably not, because there would have been fewer (or no) points of dispute in the lawsuit
