None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Answer:
Bullying and or degrading comments
Explanation:
bullying can be a main source of some peoples depression and\or anxiety
when people bully other people who can possibly already have depression it can add fuel to the fire and just make it worse causing it to stick around and worsen..
just my opinion. i know this dosent help the whole thing but its a start
Answer:
Capitalism
Explanation:
Capitalism fueled global tradie relations
