Ask question

Ask question

All categories

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

2 years ago

9

Juan has a piano next month . last week he practiced for 8 hours in the morning and 7 hours in the afternoon. each practice sess

ion is 2 hours long. how many full practices session did juan complete?

1 answer:

timofeeve [1]2 years ago

7 0

First of all we will divide 8 by 2 to get the number of full practices in the morning, which is 4. Next divide 7 by 2 to get the number of practices in the afternoon. Although there is a remainder, that remainder is not a full practice session, so we only count the whole numbers which is 3.
4 + 3 = 7 full practice sessions.

You might be interested in

Between 1998 and 2018, inflation for prices of goods and services has been about 51%. Suppose a salon charged $18 for a basic ha

Anestetic [448]

Answer: $22.12

Step-by-step explanation:

I just did the compound interest formula which is

starting amount * (1. interst rate) ^ number of years

example if you have 100$ and you want to know how much it is worth if it appretiates by 7% of a period of 20 years it would look something like this;

100 * (1.10) ^20 = 672.74$

but since you have to figure out what it was in 2008 which was exactly half way in the period you divide the exponent by half so your formula should be;

I know the answer is right because I asked my teacher and it's correct.

REAL EXAMPLE: 18 * (1.51) ^.5 = 22.12$

5 0

2 years ago

Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness

Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 \ne p_2$

b

in 2012 $\r p_1 =0.41$

in 2010 $\r p_2 =0.35$

c

The p-value is $p-value = 0.0072$

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The sample size in 2012 is $n_1 = 1000$

The number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is k = 410

The sample size in 2010 is $n_2 = 900$

The number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is u = 315

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 \ne p_2$

Generally the sample proportion for 2012 is mathematically represented as

$\r p_1 = \frac{k}{n_1}$

=> $\r p_1 = \frac{410}{1000}$

=> $\r p_1 =0.41$

Generally the sample proportion for 2010 is mathematically represented as

$\r p_2 = \frac{u}{n_2}$

=> $\r p_2 = \frac{315}{900}$

=> $\r p_2 =0.35$

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\r p = \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}$

=> $\r p = \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}$

=> $\r p = 0.3816$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$z = \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )} }$

$z = \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )} }$

$z = \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )} }$

$z = 2.688$

Generally the p- value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688 )$

From the z -table

$P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036$

So

$p-value = 2 *0.0036$

$p-value = 0.0072$

So from the p-value obtained we see that p-value < $\alpha$ so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0

3 years ago

A cleaning liquid cost 10 3/4 cents the ounce. what is the cost of a 32 ounce bottle?

Andrews [41]

$343 would be the cost

3 0

3 years ago

A ball is dropped from a height of 5ft and bounces to 60% of I?ts previous height in each subsequent bounce

Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Im assuming youre trying to answer what is the 60% height, it would be 3ft

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

2 üssü - 12 ile 25 üssü 2 nin çarpımı nedir?

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

2 üssü 12 demek 2'yi 12 defa yanyana yazmak demektir yani 2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×=4096 eder.

şimdi diğerini yapalım aynı şekilde yapmış olursak 25×25 =625 eder

ŞİMDİ SONUCU BULALIM:4096×625=2,560,000

KOLAY GELSİN

7 0

2 years ago