The Han Dynasty changed a few notable policies that were established.
1) The Qin Dynasty banned Confucianism (belief that people are naturally good) and rather focused on Legalism, but the Han dynasty lifted the ban and allowed it to be practiced once again. The Han Dynasty used Confucianism as a model by which to govern.
2) The Han Dynasty reversed the autocratic policies of the Qin Dynasty. The Qin Dynasty was ruled by a single emperor (which is an autocracy) but the Han Dynasty allowed several leaders to rule and have power rather than one man.
I'm sure there are more, but these ones should do. Hope this helps! :)
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
They had to face slavery, and whites had the authorities that colored people didn't.
At the beginning <span>the motivations for European exploration and conquest was to spread their religion, Christianity. However, later on, it became more about imperialism and wealth. </span>
I would have to say B. Head start programs
