1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavlova-9 [17]
3 years ago
6

The main factor contributing to the establishment of modern Israel was that the Jewish people had

Social Studies
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
5 0
You have to be more specific on what you need. Israel was made as compensation for the death of 6 million white Jews. They also longed for a country due to constant oppression in history as well. If this isn't want you're looking for comment back with more details.
You might be interested in
When the government first shut down, what were lawmakers having trouble reaching an agreement about?
alexandr1967 [171]
<span>Their argument was on the budget.
The main cause that become a hindrance for a  law to be passed is the budget.
The congress often not agree on which budget allocation they need to prioritize when considering a bill. For example, Congress from Republican party tend to favor to allocate the budget for military while the one from Democratic party tend want to spend it on government programs.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Professor pegler's research efforts focus on how the use of heuristics influences the way people assess financial risks. which s
Tema [17]

If Professor pegler's research efforts focus on how the use of heuristics influences the way people assess financial risks. The specialty area that this research best represent is:<u> Cognitive Psychology.</u>

<h3>What is Cognitive Psychology?</h3>

Cognitive Psychology can be defined a study that focuses on how people think, act, behave, learn, solve problem etc.

On the other hand heuristics  can be defined as the techniques that enables people to make use of their problem solving skills to solve problems.

Therefore if Professor pegler's research efforts focus on how the use of heuristics influences the way people assess financial risks. The specialty area that this research best represent is:<u> Cognitive Psychology.</u>

Learn more about Cognitive Psychology here:brainly.com/question/26504675

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Some researchers claim that more innocent individuals have been wrongly convicted due to ___________ than all other causes combi
Kisachek [45]

Some researchers claim that more innocent individuals have been wrongly convicted due to inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony is common than all other causes combined.

  • Eyewitness testimony is a word used in law. It alludes to a description provided by individuals about an occasion they were present for. For instance, they can be asked to describe a crime or a car accident they saw during a trial. This includes information about the crime scene, the offenders' identities, etc.
  • Studies have indicated that roughly half of all wrongful convictions are caused by false eyewitness testimony. When Ohio State University researchers looked at hundreds of false convictions, they found that about 52 percent of the errors were due to inaccuracies made by eyewitnesses.

Learn more about Eyewitness testimony from here :brainly.com/question/26651069

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
How was citizenship defined during each time period? How was enfranchisement (the right to vote) defined in 1776 to 1870?
Zinaida [17]
You had to be a white male that owned property and was rich
3 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The _____ of schizophrenia are marked by a distortion or an excess of normal function, whereas the _____ reflect social withdraw
    8·1 answer
  • Maria, a latin american, is engaged to leon, an african american. despite their different backgrounds, they consider themselves
    6·1 answer
  • What are some reasons that abortions should be illegal?
    15·2 answers
  • Understandable meaning for monastery?
    6·1 answer
  • The current constitution of the state of Texas was approved in1976 by a large majority of voters. Since then, voters have declin
    5·1 answer
  • Studying whether or not citizens are able to effectively influence government policies is a good way to determine:
    13·1 answer
  • The invisible hand school and the inherence school: a. believe long-term success comes from social responsibility. b. both refus
    10·1 answer
  •  Dysentery (diarrhea) spreads through Valley Forge because there is no...
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Tobacco was the "cash crop" that caused foreigners to settle in Hawaii.<br> True<br> False
    12·2 answers
  • When king afonso i of kongo invited the jesuit missionaries to his kingdom, what religion was he already practicing? answer:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!