Answer:
B. different communication elements work together to create something different, and greater, than the sum of its parts
Explanation:
According to the Synergestic Model of Communication, people engaging in a communication process will act together combining elements that result in a whole greater and different than the sum of its parts.
This means there is a shift in traditional views of communication.
Examples of synergestic communication: sports teams , sportclubs and professional settings, like team building.
In all these instances a sense of exchange of ideas takes place and makes the goals and communication to be in one spirit.
The outcome results in a positive and rewarding experience for everyone.
Answer: Corporate money will make elections less likely to reflect the public will
Explanation: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning campaign finance. The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political purposes by corporations and organisations.
Justice Stevens had a dissenting opinion which goes thus; the Court's opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt.
A manager alone cannot perform all the tasks assigned to him. In order to meet the targets, the manager should delegate authority. Delegation of Authority means division of authority and powers downwards to the subordinate. Delegation is about entrusting someone else to do parts of your job. Delegation of authority can be defined as subdivision and sub-allocation of powers to the subordinates in order to achieve effective results.
Answer:
the cost of a post secondary degree is worth it.
Explanation:
The correct answer is "the cost of a post secondary degree is worth it". This is because the statement implies that having this kind of degree is better than having a secondary degree.
Here are the reasons why the other answers are not correct:
- "the cost of a post secondary degree should be avoided": this is false, as the statement on the question says that in the long term it is better to have a post secondary degree.
- "you should not be concerned about the amount of debt you go into to pay for it": the statement provided discusses that it is better to have post secondary degree than not habing it. It does not address being concerned about its cost. It is always recommended to understand how you are going to pay for a degree, so you can plan for which kind of job you will need to have after finishing the degree as well as how much money you need to earn to have good quality of life.
- "the more money you pay for the degree guarantees a higher salary": the statement does not talk about the ratio between salary and cost of a degree.
