1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly_w [17]
3 years ago
8

Why was the purchase of the Louisiana Territory a difficult decision for President Jefferson to make?

History
2 answers:
Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago
4 0
<span>President Jefferson believed that of it wasn't already in the Constitution then that power belonged to the states instead of the Federal Government. The ability to make the purchase wasn't in the Constitution but the deal needed to be completed quickly.</span>
marissa [1.9K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In 1803, despite his doubts about the constitutionality of the power of Congress to buy land, President Jefferson made the purchase of Louisiana to France, doubling the size of the United States. The land acquired in this way amounted to 23% of the United States today, of about 810,000 ml², comprised the current states of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, the Minnesota area east of the Mississippi River, North Dakota, Dakota of the South, Nebraska, Oklahoma, most of Kansas, zones of Montana, Wyoming, the territory of Colorado to the east of the Rocky Mountains and the one of Luisiana to the east of the Mississippi river, with the city of New Orleans included.

The region of Louisiana was occupied by France at the beginning of the 18th century. In 1763, the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Seven Years' War, established that the eastern part of the Mississippi was ceded to Great Britain, while ratifying the Treaty of Fontainebleau by which France ceded the rest of Louisiana to Spain in compensation for the loss of Florida. In 1800 this territory returned to French sovereignty by the third Treaty of San Ildefonso. In 1802, however, there were two events that President Thomas Jefferson considered hostile to the interests of the United States: the sending of French troops to New Orleans and the island of Santo Domingo to suppress uprisings that had broken out in those territories, and the abolition of the right of deposit, privilege agreed with the American merchants in the past to store goods in New Orleans until their transshipment. Jefferson sent James Monroe to Paris to collaborate with the plenipotentiary minister in France, Robert R. Livingston, in the attempt to carry out one of the following four possibilities: the purchase of eastern and western Florida and New Orleans; the acquisition only of New Orleans; or the purchase of the territory on the banks of the Mississippi River to build a US port or the acquisition in perpetuity of navigation and storage rights.

The previous negotiations between Livingston and the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord, failed. Later the international situation worsened for France. The French army of Santo Domingo was decimated by an epidemic of yellow fever and an uprising broke out on the island. Napoleon, determined to make the most of such a complicated situation, gave new instructions to Talleyrand, and on April 11, 1803, he surprised Monroe and Livingston with a single, non-negotiable offer: the purchase of Louisiana as a whole. Although this operation exceeded their powers, the US ambassadors accepted. At the beginning of May, three documents were signed by which France ceded Louisiana to the United States. The agreed price was of 15 million dollars, of which 11,250,000 supposed the payment to France of the rights of cession of the territories. The remaining $ 3,750,000 were used by the United States government to satisfy the claims of its citizens against France.

At the time of the purchase, Jefferson was questioned about the constitutionality of the acquisition of territories for not adding a new amendment to the US Constitution that would give him legal coverage. However, the acquisition of Louisiana was ratified by the United States Senate in the form of a treaty.

You might be interested in
1)Most electoral support in the states that would eventually become the Confederacy went to
Nana76 [90]

Hey there! I'm happy to help!

QUESTION 1

Most electoral support in the states that would eventually become the Confederacy went to...

A) Bell.

B) Breckinridge.

C) Davis.

D) Douglas

It was the Southern states that ended up becoming the Confederacy. Most of the Southern states are Green, which corresponds with B) Breckinridge.

QUESTION 2

Using the electoral map, you can determine that

A) Lincoln only won because of a divided south.

B) Lincoln should not have been sworn in as President.

C) Breckinridge lost only because territories could not vote.

D) the majority of Americans could not agree on a presidential candidate.

Answer A is incorrect because the South was literally all green so they were not divided.

Answer B is incorrect because Lincoln won the electoral vote so he should have been sworn in as President.

Answer C is incorrect because the territories would not have had that many electoral votes if they were states and not all of them would have been in support of slavery, so this answer option is unlikely.

The support was very split in the country for the candidates; Lincoln won mainly because there were so many people in the North. So, I would settle on D) the majority of Americans could not agree on a presidential candidate.

QUESTION 3

Most of Douglas’ support came from which of these areas?

A) border states

B) southern states

C) northern states

D) western territories

Douglas only won the state of Missouri. This was a border state between the North and the South, so the best answer is A) border states. He didn't really have much support in the North or the South, and the Western territories couldn't vote yet. California and Oregon were Western states but they voted for Lincoln.

I hope that this helps! Have a wonderful day! :D

4 0
4 years ago
The action of which two people played a large role in ending communism in poland?
fredd [130]
There are several people that played a significant role in ending communism in poland. Since you provide no options, two of those people that played a large role in ending communism in Poland were :

- Lech Walesa
- Pope John Paul II

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which equation has no solution?
KatRina [158]

-2(x+1)=3x-2-5x hope it helps

6 0
3 years ago
Factorize 25x² - 20xy + 4y² using the identities<br>​
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

Explanation:

25x² - 20xy + 4y²

=(5x)² - 2 * 5x*2y + (2y)²

=( 5x - 2y)²

6 0
3 years ago
The urban migration trend has stopped worldwide. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F User: Reforestation
RideAnS [48]
No, it is false that the urban migration trend has stopped worldwide, since many people still flock to cities. And reforestation projects are driven by "<span>d. logging companies planning for future harvests," since it's in their best interest to have more trees. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What event led to an open alliance between france and the U.S.?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the simple subject of a tornado shape is like a funnel?
    8·1 answer
  • Most slaves taken from africa were sent to
    8·1 answer
  • The dawes plan 1924 showed americas
    14·1 answer
  • Why do questions about being a polygamist or an anarchist seem<br><br> out of place?
    5·1 answer
  • What enabled the hijackers to get through security?
    11·1 answer
  • What does this excerpt tell you about the nature of the fighting in Vietnam?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of this 'encyclopedia entry' in 1932?
    8·1 answer
  • How many hours a day did a cowboy typically work on a ranch? How many hours was he on the trail?
    6·1 answer
  • In the first reading,
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!