1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
4 years ago
13

I need help on what to say

Mathematics
2 answers:
Rama09 [41]4 years ago
8 0
Your answer would be:
A:    A co-efficient would be 75 or 8
      The variables, D and W, as the constant would be 25

B:  75d + 8w + 25
      75 * 5 + 8 * 48 + 25
      375 + 384 + 25 = 400 + 384
      Answer: Javier Earns $784.00


C: If Javier gets an increase in his stipend, and received $40.00 for snacks, the constant in the equation would change. 
The Co-efficient are affected by the amount of days, or windows he worked.
installed, while the constant before, of $25.00 is non related to the work due to the fact that it's used for snacks. So, since his stipend increased for snacks, the only thing changes was the constant.





Hope that helps!!!
garik1379 [7]4 years ago
7 0
Part A: 75 and 8 are both coefficients in this case since both numbers are in front of a variable. D and W are two variables in this expression since they are letters that represent unknown numbers. 25 is the constant since that number does not change.

Part B: If Javier works for 5 days and installs 48 windows, he earns $784.
75d+8w+25
75(5)+8(48)+25
375+384+25
784

Part C: If Javier receives $40 for snacks instead of 25, the constant would change since 25 was the constant to begin with. The rest of the expression would stay the same. The new expression would look like this: 75d+8w+40.

I hope this was helpful.
You might be interested in
shi x, miao w, and tchetgen tchetgen ej. (2020). multiply robust causal inference with double negative control adjustment for ca
fomenos

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

What is unmeasured cofounding?

  • By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
  • The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.

Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.

Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.

Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:

brainly.com/question/10863424

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Help ill give brainliest too
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

I think so..

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6+n-3×6÷9 when n=2<br> this is a mathematical problem
Len [333]

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm so sorry...i solved this on a calculator so i'm not so sure how to explain once again i'm sorry.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a two-player game, five cards, numbered 1 through 5, are placed in a bag. A card is drawn at random, and the players look at
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

If it is less than 3, Player 1 earns 3 points.

If not, Player 2 earns 2 points.

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Player 1</u> :

p(N < 3) = p(N = 1 or N = 2) = 2/5

<u>Player 2</u> :

p(N ≥ 3) = p(N = 3 or N = 4 or N = 5) = 3/5

<u>We notice that</u> :

p(N < 3) × 3 = (2/5) × 3 = 6/5

On the other hand,

p(N ≥ 3) × 2 = (3/5) × 2 = 6/5

since ,the probability player 1 win multiplied by the associated number of points (3)

is equal to

the probability player 2 win multiplied by the associated number of points (2).

Then the game is fair.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!
pashok25 [27]
Multiplying both sides of    <span>−1/3x≤−6    by -3 results in "x is equal to or greater than 18."
 
Note that multiplying such an inequality requires reversing the direction of the inequality symbol.

I subst. 18 for x in   </span><span>−1/3x≤−6    as a check, and found that  the resulting inequality is true.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How much does 36 go into 54
    14·2 answers
  • Place the two numbers 42.5 and 42.35 on the number line that are greater than 42.0 and less than 43.0. Compare the two numbers o
    5·2 answers
  • 4 out of 9 dogs weigh less than 20 pounds what is the decimal equivalent to the number of dogs weighing under 20 lb
    12·1 answer
  • Line AB contains points A (1, 2) and B (−2, 6) The slope of line AB is
    5·2 answers
  • In the figure, m∠1=m∠2 = 22 and m∠3 = m∠4 = 123. Find m∠TSK.
    15·2 answers
  • Find points and graph the following equation. Is this a linear graph? -5x + 6y = 2
    8·1 answer
  • Who ever helps me gets brainliest​
    14·1 answer
  • X (B+7)=9 solve for x &amp;Justification
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me solve this please
    6·1 answer
  • The figure below shows a triangle with vertices A and B on a circle and vertex outside it! Side AG is tangent to the circle. Sid
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!