It will be approximately equal.
<h3>How will the final kinetic energy change?</h3>
We can infer that all of the energy in the electron is Potential energy (PE) because the energy provided by the photon is hardly enough to outweigh the work function.
It will gain kinetic energy (KE) as it advances in the direction of the anode because it is moving through an electric field. All of the PE will have been transformed to KE by the time it reaches the anode.
According to the question
K = hf - W
W = Work function
The energy of photons is comparable. After conversion, there was only a little amount of KE remaining.
Therefore, PE (W) essentially equals KE (K).
It will about be equal.
Learn more about work function here:
brainly.com/question/19595244
#SPJ4
Answer:
Wavelength = 0.48 m (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Speed of sound = 340 m/s
Frequency = 706 hz
Find:
Wavelength
Computation:
Wavelength = Speed of sound / Frequency
Wavelength = 340 / 706
Wavelength = 0.48 m (Approx)
J can get answer on this way:
Ek=m*V*V/2= (24kg*2m/s*2m/s)/2=48 Ј
Answer:
The paper focuses on the biology of stress and resilience and their biomarkers in humans from the system science perspective. A stressor pushes the physiological system away from its baseline state toward a lower utility state. The physiological system may return toward the original state in one attractor basin but may be shifted to a state in another, lower utility attractor basin. While some physiological changes induced by stressors may benefit health, there is often a chronic wear and tear cost due to implementing changes to enable the return of the system to its baseline state and maintain itself in the high utility baseline attractor basin following repeated perturbations. This cost, also called allostatic load, is the utility reduction associated with both a change in state and with alterations in the attractor basin that affect system responses following future perturbations. This added cost can increase the time course of the return to baseline or the likelihood of moving into a different attractor basin following a perturbation. Opposite to this is the system's resilience which influences its ability to return to the high utility attractor basin following a perturbation by increasing the likelihood and/or speed of returning to the baseline state following a stressor. This review paper is a qualitative systematic review; it covers areas most relevant for moving the stress and resilience field forward from a more quantitative and neuroscientific perspective.
Explanation:
