Explanation:
The witness's testimony is inadmissible.
Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.
The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.
These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.
In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
A victim and his former business.
Here are some choices:
a point or line common to lines or surfaces that intersect.
a point at which two or more things intersect
an action of intersecting
Answer:
<em>Maintenance rehearsal; elaborative rehearsal </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology, </em><em>maintenance rehearsal is described as a process that involves an individual's tendency to repeatedly think or verbalize a specific piece of the event's or situation's information. However, an individual's capacity of short-term memory to carry out a piece of information for about twenty seconds and through maintenance rehearsal it gets increased to thirty seconds.</em>
<em>In psychology, </em><em>elaborative rehearsal is defined as an individual's memory technique through which an individual thinks about a particular meaning of a specific term that he or she remembers by repeating a particular word again and again.</em>
<em> </em>
It is so that the federal government can't impose excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishment.
Hope this helps :)
