Answer: increased, trade- offs, marginal thinking, small.
Explanation:
According to the passage, The coach is weighing a slightly<u> increased </u>risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. This weighing o<u>f trade-offs </u>is an example of <u>marginal thinking,</u> because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u>small </u>shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
Answer:
The answer is $47.6
Explanation:
Solution
Given that
You bought = 140 shares of Mitchum Trading for $50.07 per share
The quarterly dividend = $.17
The current price = $51.03
So we find the total dividend income you received which is computed below:
The total dividend received = (0.17 * 2) * 140
=(0.34) * 140
= $47.6
Therefore the total dividend of income that you received is $47.6
Answer: b. Economies of Scope
Explanation:
Economies of Scope refers to a situation where a company is able to reduce the cost of producing two or more goods by combining their production thereby leading to savings in the production process.
Economies of Scope in effect points out that there are some goods that when produced in tandem with another, lead to a cost reduction which means that its savings is <em>based on variety</em>.
Goods that usually achieve Economies of Scope are goods that are compliments, produced by similar methods or use similar inputs for production.
Firm A merging with Firm B produced the 5 radios and batteries cheaper so the new company is experiencing Economies of Scope.
Answer:
C. Responsiveness of quantity demanded to a percentage change in income.
Explanation:
Income elasticity is defined as the responsiveness of the quantity of a good demanded by an individual as his income changes, all other factors being constant.
Mathematically it is calculated as percentage change in quantity demanded divided by percentage change in income.
Income elasticity is used to find out if a good is a necessity or a luxury good.
The demand for goods that are a necessity does not change with a change in income.
However demand for a luxury good increases as income increases and vice versa
Answer:
Explanation:
We shall apply the concept of coefficient of variation to know the consistency of data
coefficient of variation
= standard deviation / mean or average
In case of City A
coefficient of variation = 86 / 820
= .1048
In case of City B
coefficient of variation = 75 / 790
= .0949
Since it is less for city B , rent for this city is more consistence or with less of variation
So the conclusion is false.