1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
9

Southern states objected to the 14th amendment because it granted citizenship to former slaves who had been freed by the Civil W

ar. Why then was the amendment adopted?
A.
the slaves agreed to move to states who approved the amendment
B.
enough women voted for its approval that it was adopted
C.
three-fourths of the other states approved the amendment
D.
two-thirds of the other states approved the amendment
E.
a constitutional convention approved the amendment
Law
1 answer:
navik [9.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hey mari!!

Explanation:

On July 28, 1868, the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. The amendment grants citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States" which included former slaves who had just been freed after the Civil War. The amendment had been rejected by most Southern states but was ratified by the required three-fourths of the states. Known as the "Reconstruction Amendment," it forbids any state to deny any person "life, liberty or property, without due process of law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Other groups tried to use the 14th Amendment to further their causes. Women attempted to use it to proclaim their right to vote, and African Americans tried to use it as well. On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson that "separate but equal" facilities were considered sufficient to satisfy the 14th Amendment. It wasn't until May 17, 1954, however, that the Court reversed the Plessy decision, bringing the era of government-sanctioned segregation to an end.

It was the 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, which finally gave African Americans the right to vote. It states that "the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In practice, however, it took almost 100 more years and the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to remove barriers such as poll taxes, literacy tests, and intimidation that prevented African Americans and other people of color from freely exercising their right to vote. Note that the 15th amendment makes no mention of sex. It was not until the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920 that women were explicitly given the vote.

You might be interested in
True or false?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is a gangster also a druggy
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

only the ones that want to get in to does things but not all gangster are druggys

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court, what must you do?
Tom [10]

Answer:

I will file a complaint and 'serve' a copy of the complaint to the defendant.

Explanation:

In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court involves the following process.

First, FILING OF COMPLAINTS; the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and “serves” a copy of the complaint on the defendant.

The plaintiff may seek money to compensate for the damages, or may ask the court to order the defendant to stop the conduct that is causing the harm.

Second, THE CASE PREPARATION; litigants must provide information to each other about the case, such as the identity of witnesses and copies of any documents related to the case.

And the trial process.

6 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
Ket [755]
It should be c. Steps for reviving a green card
8 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • “Police and crime commissioners have no real power, their presence is to just keep the public happy” arguments for and against
    6·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Cameron works for his state’s highway patrol agency. His role in the agency is that of a chief execut
    12·2 answers
  • Hi i have a science project i have to ask 50 people that when they see blue,white green turquoise yellow orange and red what do
    8·1 answer
  • Favre, Ch. 9 (Access to the Court – Standing and Legal Injury)
    10·1 answer
  • PharMax, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, sells its drugs for use in not-for-profit hospitals at a lower wholesale price than the
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a philosophical question?
    8·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    8·2 answers
  • Question 11 of 1
    7·1 answer
  • Consider systematic discrimination, contextual discrimination, institutional and individual acts of discrimination. Which do you
    11·1 answer
  • Which branch of government is responsible for enforcing laws?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!