Answer:
Defensive listening
Explanation:
The concept of defensive listening refers to the tendency we have to take an innocent comment from someone else as a personal attack to ourselves. Basically, it refers to take a general statement as a personal attack.
In this example, Thelma baked a cake and Louise said her mom would decorate the cake so elaborately. This is a <u>general statement about Thelma's memories of the cakes her mom would made</u>. However, T<u>helma takes this as a personal attack and responds in a defensive manner </u>saying sorry for not decorating the cake extravagantly. Thus, this would be an example of defensive listening.
They are usually inprisoned
Answer:Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first component refers to the accused<u> individual's </u><u>Ability to interact rationally with an attorney</u> The second component refers to the accused individual's <u>understanding how the court process work.</u>
Explanation:
Competency to Stand Trial is a a legal construct that states that an individual or defendant should be able to understand the nature, reason and purpose of a legal proceedings against him and should be able to effectively interact rationally with an attorney or counsel in his defense. Such defendant should be able to understand the type of charges against him or her , the court room and the participants included, also he should be able to cooperate with his attorney by giving details to in terms of facts including reasons and causes of his actions for offence alleged on him or her so as to enable the attorney challenge witnesses on his behalf
Only an individual who does not show a mental disorder or defect can understand this conditions and cooperate with an attorney, In cases where individuals try to feign mental disorder, a Psychological testing is carried out so as to show competency for such individual to stand trial .
Answer:
The desire for a new Constitution was borne out of some of the lapses of the Articles of Confederation which produced a weak central government. In 1787, representatives from 12 states from the existing 13 states in the United States converged to draft the new U.S Constitution. Several deliberations were made to form a better and stronger system of government. However, two alliances were formed at that time as a faction. One was the Federalists and the other was the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. They wanted a sizable amount of representation in government among states based on their population.
During the process of ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights need not be part of the Constitution. They believed that with the addition of the Bill of Rights, the rights of citizens would be affected negatively and less protected.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the same representation in all states. This alliance was led by Patrick Henry. They argued for the Bill of Rights and was against every move to establish a new Constitution, on the ground that, the constitution will give more powers to the National government and this will be detrimental to the citizens' rights.
A compromise was agreed on and after much debate on the issues of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was submitted to the Congress of Federation in 1787 and by 1788, it had been ratified by most states.
