This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are as follows:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an _________ offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
a. a problem
b. an indigent
c. a contract
d. an assigned
e. an at risk
Answer:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an b. indigent offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
Explanation:
An indigent can be defined as someone who does not have the means and resources to provide the basic necessities of life, such as food and clothing. Likewise, an indigent offender is someone who does not have sufficient income to afford an attorney. In such cases, the court appoints and pays for the lawyer to represent the offender. This is actually a quite common occurrence, sometimes reaching the number of 82% of court appointed lawyers for felony defendants.
I think traditional cuz they do it based off of past generations
Answer:
On May 17, 1954, Chief Justice Earl Warren issued the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education, ruling that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. ... Brown was initially met with inertia and, in most southern states, active resistance.
Explanation:
Actually, I only have an anecdotal evidence: from my personal experience.
I know a person who described her friendship with a person from a lower caste and how hard it was for the person from the smaller caste to get a better job precisely because everyone though that she is supposed to do only lower-tier jobs, as people of her caste "should".
The discrimination is still very much present: it's really hard to overcome a very old prejudice in people: people still perceive people of lower casts as "less worthy".
If this was not the caste, the regular support from the government for the lower castes (for example reserved seats at the universities) would be discontinued. (this is an example you can use: the government still thinks it's necessary to help the lower castes, if there was no more discrimination, they would have stopped). <span />
The answer is the last one , sorry if I’m wrong
