Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
Answer: True
According to the law of demand, the demand for a good increases when its price falls. Thus, when a fruit or vegetable is in season, it is relatively less expensive than in off seasons. Thus, consumers buy more of these seasonal fruits in season. Thus, demand for the good increases when it becomes cheaper.
Thus, the statement is true.
It should be noted that Researchers assess the value of a project by comparing the benefits of answering some of their questions as well as the cost associated with conducting the research.
<h3>What is a project?</h3>
A project can be regarded as an undertaking which is been carried out collaboratively and entail research or design, that is carefully planned to achieve a goal.
It is necessary for a Researchers to assess the value of a project by comparing the benefits of answering some of their questions .
Learn more about a project at;
brainly.com/question/4771644
The denominator of the fixed asset turnover ratio is AVERAGE FIXED ASSET.
The fixed assert turnover ratio refers to the ratio of sales to the value of fixed asset of a company. The ratio is very important in evaluating how a company is using its fixed assets to generate sales.
Mathematically, fixed asset turnover ratio = Net sales / Average fixed assets.
The numerator is net sales while the denominator is average fixed asset.
Answer:
lets look at the options and find the correct one!
obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.
Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.
Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!
d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.
e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.
but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.
Explanation:
